Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Er:YAG ·¹ÀÌÀú·Î ó¸®ÇÑ »ó¾ÆÁú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ÜÀÏ ´Ü°è Á¢Âø½Ã½ºÅÛÀÇ °áÇÕ

Bonding of single-step adhesive systems to Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 2013³â 37±Ç 1È£ p.31 ~ 38
ÀÌ¸í±¸, Á¶¿µ°ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌ¸í±¸ ( Lee Myung-Goo ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Á¶¿µ°ï ( Cho Young-Gon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the microshear bond strength (¥ìSBS) of three single-step adhesive systems to dentin.

Materials and Methods: The occlusal dentin surfaces of 30 extracted teeth were exposed. Samples were divided into six groups according to laser irradiation of dentin surface and type of single-step adhesive system (LP group: Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M ESPE Dental Products), LP-L group: Er:YAG laser (KEY Laser 3, KaVo)+Adper Prompt L-Pop, GB group: G-Bond (GC Corporation), GB-L group: Er:YAG laser+G-Bond, AB group: ALL-Bond SE (Bisco Inc.), AB-L group: Er:YAG laser+ALL-Bond SE). The bonded specimens were subjected to ¥ìSBS test, and the resin-dentin interfaces were observed under field emission scanning electron microscope.

Results: There were no significant differences among the ¥ìSBS of LP, GB, and AB groups, whereas the ¥ìSBS of the LP-L and AB-L groups were significantly higher than that of the GB-L group (p<0.05). More adhesive failures were seen in the laser-irradiated groups than in the non-irradiated groups. All other groups, except the GB-L group, showed close adaptation at the interface of dentin and composite resin.

Conclusion: Use of Er:YAG laser irradiation can reduce the bonding strength of composite resin to dentin depending on the type of single-step adhesive system.

Å°¿öµå

Er:YAG laser irradiation; Microshear bond strength; Dentin; Single-step adhesive systems; Field emission scanning electron microscope

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI